JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 15, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo

✓Claimant Lenixxy Bernarda Avila Romero

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia T-628/16.

La accionada en el proceso de la referencia le solicitó a la Corporación modificar el verbo “retirar” señalado en el numeral segundo de la parte resolutiva de la providencia mencionada, por otro que implique una modificación o sustitución de los broches o falsos.

En su criterio, la aplicación de la orden de retirar los broches resulta un hecho tan parecido o similar a quitar en un conjunto residencial las portadas de ingreso y salida.

La Corte constató que la petición de aclaración no solo incumplió con el requisito de oportunidad, sino que no encuadra dentro de las causales establecidas por la jurisprudencia constitucional para que proceda la misma.

Consecuentemente con lo anterior, se RECHAZA,

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. De acuerdo con las consideraciones expuestas, RECHAZAR la solicitud de aclaracion de la Sentencia T-628 de 2016, formulada por la senora Lenixxy Bernarda Avila Romero, en su calidad de accionada.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR la presente providencia a la peticionaria, con la advertencia de que contra esta decision, no procede ningun recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.